- Multiple residents, organizations, and stakeholders emphasize concern over proposed high-density housing developments on downtown parking lots, citing impacts on traffic, parking, character, and local businesses. Alternative sites, such as city-owned land at the Civic Center, USGS site, and private developments, are suggested for more appropriate housing solutions. The importance of environmental reviews, infrastructure capacity, and community input are stressed, along with a call for careful planning aligned with the city's budget, growth, and preservation goals.
- Residents advocate for significant investment in community amenities such as sports fields, recreational spaces, and infrastructure improvements in the SRI project, aligning with other developments that provide substantial community benefits. Concerns are raised about the allocation of funds, infrastructure readiness, and the impact of development costs on city finances.
- Multiple comments highlight the need for improved road infrastructure, traffic management, and parking solutions, particularly in relation to new housing projects and downtown access. There are calls for better planning and funding for transportation upgrades to accommodate growing population and development activities.
- Support exists for exploring alternative sites for affordable housing to avoid overburdening downtown parking lots and infrastructure. Several residents express concern about the financial implications, construction costs, and potential impact on city resources, urging careful budgeting and transparent financial planning.
- Residents demand comprehensive community benefits for large projects—expecting investments like bike paths, recreational areas, and amenities—comparable to other major developments with large budgets. There is also scrutiny over costs related to infrastructure, planning, and mitigation of project impacts.
- Residents emphasize the importance of transparent decision-making regarding project costs, funding sources, and use of city funds. Concerns about financial accountability, project feasibility, and whether the city’s budget adequately supports proposed developments are expressed.
- Several residents and professionals criticize California's housing mandates, arguing they lead to overdevelopment, legal conflicts, and misallocation of city resources, including controversial efforts to declare downtown parking lots as surplus land for housing projects.
- Widespread opposition from residents, business owners, and property owners emphasizes the importance of existing parking infrastructure, concern over economic decline, and the need for transparent processes. Many believe development on parking lots would harm downtown vitality and local businesses.
- Many residents advocate for building affordable housing on city-owned parking lots, emphasizing benefits like reducing commute burdens for essential workers, revitalizing downtown, and increasing walkability. Several call for additional amenities like parks, sports fields, and community spaces.
- Several commenters raise issues about increased traffic, parking shortages, construction disruptions, and potential negative effects on local businesses and the community character. A few suggest alternative sites such as Civic Center or SRI campus for housing projects.
- Multiple residents argue that downtown parking is vital for economic activity and that creating parking structures or alternative sites is essential to support growth without harming the existing vibrant community.
- Supporters advocate for new sports fields, parks, and recreational facilities in development plans to address current deficits, especially for youth sports and community activities, emphasizing the importance of quality of life improvements.
- Some residents critique the process of declaring parking lots surplus, citing insufficient studies, legal risks, lack of community engagement, and concerns about city compliance with state laws. Several call for public votes and transparency.
- A segment of residents and property owners support the development, viewing it as necessary to address housing shortages, support local workers, and revitalize downtown. They suggest solutions such as underground parking and better urban planning.
- Discussions include concerns about regional housing and economic trends, vacancy rates, traffic congestion, and the influence of state and corporate policies urging more high-density development.
- Numerous residents call for community involvement, public votes, and comprehensive impact assessments before proceeding with housing projects on downtown parking lots, emphasizing the need for balanced, inclusive planning.
- Residents of Menlo Park are expressing strong opposition to the proposal of converting downtown parking lots into affordable housing. Concerns focus on the significant loss of parking spaces, which are deemed crucial for the vibrant downtown economy, and fears that the housing project will exacerbate existing traffic congestion and negatively impact local businesses. Many residents advocate for exploring alternative locations for housing development that would not disrupt the downtown area. There is a call for more robust community input and careful planning to balance housing needs with the preservation of downtown amenities and infrastructure.
- Residents have highlighted the already severe traffic congestion during rush hours in Menlo Park. The addition of new residents associated with the housing projects is expected to worsen this situation. There are requests for comprehensive public transportation solutions and a better understanding of how traffic will be managed in light of the proposed new developments.
- There is widespread concern among local business owners regarding the detrimental effects the loss of parking will have on their operations. Many cite that diminished parking availability will drive customers away, hurting sales and possibly leading to store closures. There is an urgent plea for reconsideration of the housing proposal, emphasizing the need to support local businesses as integral to the community's character and economy.
- Various residents have suggested exploring alternatives for housing development, including using other sites within Menlo Park that do not compromise parking or the downtown's accessibility. Suggestions include mixed-use developments along Santa Cruz Avenue to revitalize the area without impacting essential parking spaces.
- Residents are calling for more meaningful engagement and discussions with the city council to ensure that community concerns are adequately addressed. Many are advocating for public meetings to discuss the potential impacts of the proposed developments and to gather feedback before any irreversible decisions are made.
- Residents express strong opposition to the proposal of designating downtown parking lots as surplus for affordable housing, citing potential negative impacts on local businesses, traffic congestion, and the character of downtown Menlo Park. Concerns include loss of critical parking spaces, the need for thorough traffic studies, and potential legal ramifications of repurposing the lots. Many community members advocate for a more deliberate approach to gathering input from residents and business owners, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a vibrant downtown.
- Several emails argue for increased community involvement and transparency regarding the development plans. Residents feel the proposal has been rushed without adequate notification or opportunities for public input, urging the City Council to delay decisions until more comprehensive studies and discussions can take place.
- Some residents propose that instead of purely affordable housing, the city should consider mixed-use developments that include retail, market-rate, and affordable housing to ensure the vibrancy and economic stability of downtown. There is also a call to evaluate other potential sites for development that would not diminish downtown's business landscape.
- While there is significant opposition to the specific location for affordable housing, some residents express support for affordable housing in Menlo Park, emphasizing the need for community members like teachers and public safety workers to be able to live near their workplaces. The letters suggest that housing should be planned carefully to foster both community integration and business vitality.
- Concerns are also raised regarding the economic implications of losing downtown parking and the potential for increased vacancies in local businesses. Many correspondents highlight the critical connection between accessible parking, vibrant retail, and the overall health of the local economy.
1
